Disposed¶18

Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home at Lucknow

Allahabad HC24 Jan 2025BAIL/1016/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Krishan Pahal, J.; decided 19.11.2025; CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1016/2025; applicant Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura vs State of U.P.; interim order seeking trial-status report from Trial Judge (charge framing, witnesses, adjournments); relisted for 10.12.2025; no statutes or precedents discussed; bail application left undecided.

What did the court decide?

The Trial Judge was directed to forthwith send a fresh tabulated report on the status of the trial, detailing (i) the date the charge was framed, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed as per the charge sheet, (iii) witnesses already examined with dates, (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons; if the trial has been decided, only the date of disposal and result need be reported. ¶12

Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura vs State of U.P. through… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1016 of 2025

¶3

Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At Lucknow

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Krishna	Yadav,	Anand Prakash Yadav,
	Divyansh	u Nandan	Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 67

¶10

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶11

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present.

¶12

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶13

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶14

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶15

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶16

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶17

(v) The trial court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶18

List on 10.12.2025 in the daily cause list alongwith the report.

¶19

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

¶20

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶21

November 19, 2025

¶22

(Ravi Kant)

¶23

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home at Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mustaq Ali @ Goonga @ Baura v. State of U.P. through Secretary Home at Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Kanijan vs State of U.P.

Vikash Nishad vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Triloki Yadav vs State of U.P.

Ravi Kashyap vs State of U.P.

Shivom and Another vs State of U.P.

Dilshad vs State of U.P.