Jyoti @ Babli Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35236

Court No. - 11

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10029 of 2024

Applicant :- Jyoti @ Babli Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Smt. Nalini Prakash Jain,Bhuvan Dwivedi,Dharmendra Kumar,Dharmendra Kumar Rawat,Randhir Singh,Soumya Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to enlarge her on bail in Case Crime No.106 of 2024 under Sections 302, 201, 34 I.P.C., Police Station- Hasanganj, District- Unnao.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent lady and she is in jail since 10.05.2024. He further submits that co-accused - Kallu Maurya @ Vimlesh Maurya, having identical role, has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4619 of 2025. In these circumstances, the applicant is also entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the applicant for grant of bail, but he conceded the fact that co-accused - Kallu Maurya @ Vimlesh Maurya has already been granted bail by this Court.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, contents of the F.I.R., other relevant documents, bail order of the co-accused - Kallu Maurya @ Vimlesh Maurya, ground of parity as well as totality of fact and circumstances, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶11

Let applicant - Jyoti @ Babli Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on her furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of

¶12

the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall not commit or participate in any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which she is suspected.

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against her under Section 229-A IPC/269 BNS.

¶17

(v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C./84 B.N.S.S., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC/209 BNS.

¶18

(vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

With above directions, the bail application is allowed .

¶21

Order Date :- 10.6.2025 Arpan

¶22

Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jyoti @ Babli Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti @ Babli Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishal Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Mahendra Kumar @ Mahendra Jaiswal and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lal Bahadur Shastri Bhawan Lko. and 2 Others

Mahek Vimal Thru. Her Husband Satyam Verma @ Siddharth Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. and 5 Others

Nitin Vikram Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Jyoti @ Babli Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Juvenile X, Thru. His Father and Natural Guardian vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another