Disposed¶17

Mukesh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Apr 2025BAIL/10028/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10028 of 2025; Mukesh v. State of U.P.; Krishan Pahal, J.; bail application; trial status report called from trial court; date of framing of charge; prosecution witnesses proposed and examined; adjournments with reasons; listed 01.12.2025; Registrar (Compliance); no merits of bail decided.

What did the court decide?

Trial Judge directed to submit a fresh trial-status report; application to be listed along with the report on 01.12.2025. ¶17

Mukesh vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10028 of 2025

Mukesh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sarve Nazir, Zafar Abbas
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 67

¶9

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶10

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. None is present on behalf of the informant even in the revised call.

¶11

Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a fresh report regarding the status of the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-

¶12

(i) Date on which the charge was framed.

¶13

(ii) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.

¶14

(iii) Names and number of prosecution witnesses who have been examined before the trial court with dates.

¶15

(iv) Number of times the witness was present and the case was adjourned along with the reason for the adjournment.

¶16

(v) The Trial Court need not send the aforesaid details, if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result be mentioned.

¶17

Place this application along with report on 01.12.2025 in the daily cause list.

¶18

A copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e- mail/FAX.

¶19

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶20

November 15, 2025

¶21

Sumaira

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jitendra vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sunil Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Raju vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Adil vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Islam Alias Samiullah vs State of U.P.

Kanhaiya vs State of U.P through Principal Secretary Home Gov. of U.P at Lucknow and 3 Others