Arbitration application dismissed for want of prosecution after repeated non-appearance of the applicant's counsel on consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 108 of 2024
Ashutosh Srivastava
| Versus | .....Applicant(s) |
|---|---|
| I.C.I.C.I. Bank Ltd. Through Its Regional Manager, And Another |
.....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anumesh Mishra, Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : |
Awadhesh Kumar |
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
None appears for either of the parties. This Court on 4th of September, 2025 had passed the following orders which reads as under:-
"None appears for the petitioner.
The record indicates that since the date of filing i.e. 29.11.2024, the matter has been adjourned.
List this matter again on 10th September, 2025.
In case if the learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date, appropriate orders will be passed."
Today again, none appears for the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid earlier order, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to record.
(Jaspreet Singh,J.)
September 10, 2025
ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ashutosh Srivastava
I.C.I.C.I. Bank Ltd. Through Its Regional Manager, And Another
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
