Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Akash @ Gajendra vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

Home
Allahabad HC
2025
Akash @ Gajendra vs State of U.P. and AnotherAkash @ Gajendra v. State of U.P. and Another

Dismissed¶7

Akash @ Gajendra v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC10 Jul 2025ABAIL/9333/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court | Anticipatory Bail | S.438 Cr.P.C. | Case No. 9333 of 2024 | Akash @ Gajendra v. State of U.P. and Another | dismissed for want of prosecution | interim order vacated | order communicated to court below | decision date 24.7.2025 | Single Judge: Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J. | Counsel: Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rakesh Tripathi I (Applicant); G.A. (Opposite Party)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. (Akash @ Gajendra v. State of U.P. and Another) dismissed for want of prosecution. On revised listing, none appeared to press the application on behalf of the applicant, while the learned A.G.A. was present. Interim order, if any, stood vacated. Office directed to communicate the order to the concerned court below forthwith. Order passed by Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J. on 24.7.2025.

A

Court No. - 70

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9333 of 2024

Applicant :- Akash @ Gajendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary,Rakesh Tripathi I

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

List revised. None appears to press this anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present.

Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Office is directed to communicate the order passed by this Court to concerned Court below forthwith.

Order Date :- 24.7.2025 S.Ali

Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Criminal Procedure438¶2

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Akash @ Gajendra¶3
Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rakesh Tripathi I
respondent
State of U.P. and Another¶3
G.A.

Coram

AI extract

Dr. Gautam Chowdharyauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Allahabad HC
Decided on: 10 Jul 2025 · July
Registered: 18 Sept 2024
Case no.: ABAIL/9333/2024
CNR: UPHC014964312024
Topic: Anticipatory Bail
Bench: Gautam Chowdhary
Case type: CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C.

All orders in this case

4 orders share this CNR

27 Sept 2024Order 1 · Gautam Chowdhary
10 Jul 2025Order 2 — this page · Gautam Chowdhary
23 Jul 2025Order 3
24 Jul 2025Order 4 · Gautam Chowdhary

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Gautam Chowdhary

Hasuaa vs State of U.P.
9 Jul 2025
Himanshu Tiwari @ Chhotu vs State of U.P.
9 Jul 2025
Abrar vs State of U.P.
9 Jul 2025
Rahul Sinha vs State of U.P.
10 Jul 2025
Bittu Sharma vs State of U.P.
10 Jul 2025
Ashwani Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another
10 Jul 2025

Cite this judgement

Akash @ Gajendra v. State of U.P. and Another, ABAIL/9333/2024 (ALL), decided on 10 July 2025.

The Allahabad High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Criminal Procedure438

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

Parties & counsel