Jasram v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; Jasram applicant; State of U.P. and Another opposite parties; Allahabad High Court; Court No. 70; Justice Dr. Gautam Chowdhary; counsel for applicant Sarvajeet Singh (absent); G.A./A.G.A. present; application dismissed for non-representation ('adam parvi'); decision dated September 24, 2025; digitally signed Chandra Prakash Sahani.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of representation ('adam parvi'), as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant while the learned Assistant Government Advocate was present. ¶10