Disposed

Deepak Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Feb 2025ABAIL/645/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for cheating and forgery offences was not pressed on merits. The court directed expedited disposal of the regular bail application if the applicant surrendered within two weeks, relying on Satender Kumar Antil, and granted interim protection from coercive action until surrender.

What did the court decide?

Refused anticipatory bail (not pressed); directed expeditious regular bail decision upon surrender within two weeks; no coercive action till surrender or two weeks.

Deepak Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20282

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 645 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vidya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Vidya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 464 of 2023, under Section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act, Police StationCrossing Republic, District- Ghaziabad.

¶8

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 13.2.2025

¶15

Digitally signed by :- Nitin Verma NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Deepak Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishal Yadav vs State of U.P.

Raja vs State of U.P.

Banarasi Yadav vs State of U.P.

Suman Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepak Kumar and 3 Others vs State of U.P.

Musahid and Another vs State of U.P. and Another