The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application after the applicant agreed not to press it, directing him to apply for regular bail before the trial court within two weeks, guided by the principles in Satender Kumar Antil.
Temporary protection from coercive action granted for two weeks or till surrender before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18215
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 441 of 2025
Applicant :- Shiv Bhushan Pathak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail or should apply for regular bail before the trial court?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶9
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shiv Bhushan Pathak
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
