Disposed

Krishna Pal v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC7 Feb 2025ABAIL/982/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in an IPC case was not pressed on merits; counsel sought a direction for expeditious disposal of regular bail. The court refused the relief but directed expeditious bail decision if the applicant surrenders within two weeks, with no coercive action meanwhile.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action for two weeks or till surrender; direction to decide regular bail application expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil; anticipatory bail refused.

Krishna Pal vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:17999

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 982 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Krishna Lal Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Harish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.488 of 2023, under Sections 147, 386, 506 IPC, Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Prayagraj.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 7.2.2025

¶15

SKD

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Krishna Pal v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Pal v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faizal Kabadi Alias Mohd Faisal vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Alias Mahesh vs State of U.P.

Sumit Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Tabassum vs State of U.P. and Another

Sabir and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Aslam vs State of U.P.