Anticipatory bail application dismissed with liberty to approach trial court within two weeks for regular bail. Court refrained from coercive action for that period.
Application dismissed with liberty to approach trial court for regular bail within two weeks; no coercive action for interim period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18347
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 433 of 2025
Applicant :- Saddam And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary (Home)Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application should be dismissed with liberty to file a bail application later in view of the Supreme Court's law in Satender Kumar Antil.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶8
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saddam And 3 Others
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
