Dismissed¶6

Nirbhay Singh v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC26 May 2025ABAIL/3629/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Court No. 86; neutral citation 2025:AHC:91577; anticipatory bail application u/S. 438 Cr.P.C. No. 3629 of 2024; applicant Nirbhay Singh; opposite party State of U.P. and Another; counsel Dhananjai Rai and Vibhu Rai (applicant), G.A. (State); underlying case: Case Crime No. 55 of 2022, Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC, District Aligarh (police-station name illegible); State opposed alleging large-scale business fraud; Court found no suitable and sufficient basis for anticipatory bail and rejected/dismissed the application; order dated 27.05.2025; single judge Dr. Gautam Chowdhary; no precedents cited; body text OCR-degraded Devanagari.

What did the court decide?

This Court formed the view that no suitable and sufficient basis had been presented on behalf of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail. ¶5

Nirbhay Singh Vs State of Up and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

¶6

Issue for consideration

Whether anticipatory bail under S. 438 Cr.P.C. should be granted to applicant Nirbhay Singh, who apprehends arrest in Case Crime No. 55 of 2022 under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. (name partly illegible), District Aligarh. +1 more

¶1

Ratio / Principle

This Court formed the view that no suitable and sufficient basis had been presented on behalf of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶5

Key takeaways

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of applicant Nirbhay Singh was refused/rejected at the final disposal (closing disposal clause partly legible in the damaged Devanagari text; refusal polarity corroborated by the Court's para 5 conclusion and by the State side's prayer for rejection in para 4).ratio¶6
Concluding paragraph (largely illegible owing to OCR damage) addresses presentation of a bail application by the applicant before the court concerned; its exact tenor — whether liberty to apply for regular bail or a conditioning direction — cannot be reliably determined from the surviving text.¶7

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory Bail — S. 438 Cr.P.C. — rejection of application. Anticipatory bail application (u/S. 438 Cr.P.C., No. 3629 of 2024) by Nirbhay Singh apprehending arrest in Case Crime No. 55 of 2022 under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC, police-station name partly illegible, District Aligarh (neutral citation 2025:AHC:91577; order dated 27.5.2025; Court No. 86). Counsel for the applicant urged absence of criminal history or pending cases, no likelihood of absconding, tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, conduct of all business through banking channels, and readiness to cooperate with investigation; the opposite (State) side, associated with the Government Advocate, opposed, alleging large-scale business dealings of lakhs/crores left unaccounted/untaxed and fraud practised in the guise of additional business expansion causing loss to the complainant (passage partly illegible). Hearing both sides and perusing the record, the Court (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.) held that no suitable and sufficient basis had been presented for grant of anticipatory bail, and the application was refused/rejected at disposal. The closing paragraph refers to presentation of a bail application before the court concerned, but is largely illegible. NOTE: the Hindi body text is severely OCR-degraded (diacritics stripped); readings above are reconstructions from legible fragments, with the disposal polarity corroborated across paras 4, 5 and 6. No precedent was cited or engaged with; no quantum was fixed.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91577

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3629 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Nirbhay Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhananjai Rai,Vibhu Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

वररममनअगगमजममनरआववदनपत, मम०अ०सस० 55 वरर 2022, असरर धमरम 420, 406, 504, 506 भम०दस०सस०, थमनमचसडडस, जजलमअललरढमम अगगमजममनरककममसरकररवहहएइसपमथरनमकवसमथपसरमरगकयमरयमहहगक गररफरमरलककससथगरममआववदकककजममनरपरररहमगकयमजमए।

¶7

आववदक कवगवदमनअजधवकमएवसरमजयककओरसवउपससथरगवदमनअपर शमसककयअजधवकमककसमनमएवसपतमवललकमपररशललनगकयम।

¶8

आववदक कवगवदमनअजधवकमदमरमरकरगदयमरयमहहगकआववदक गनदररहह रथमउसवआशसकमहहगकउसवउपयमरकमममलवममगररफरमरगकयमजमसकरमहह, जबगकउसकवगवरदककईगवशसनलयसमकयनहहहह।उनकवदमरमआरवयहभल रकरपसरमरगकयमरयमगकआववदकदमरमवमदलकवसमथककईधकखमधडलनहहकक रयलहह।आववदकदमरमवमदलसवगकसलभलपकमरककधनरमगशनहहललरयलहह। आववदकदमरमवमदलकवसमथनरकममर-पलटककरयलहहएवसनहलजमनसवममरनव ककधमककदलरयलहह।आववदककवगवरदआरकगपरधमरमओसकमककई अपरमध नहहबनरमहह।उनकमयहभलरकरहहगकआववदक कमककईआपरमजधकइगरहमस नहहहहरथमआववदक कवगवरदअबरकककईबलपपवरकपगकयमजमरलनहहकक रईहह।यहभलरकरपसरमरगकयमरयमगकआववदक जमसचरथमपरलकणकवदडरमन सहयकरकरनवकमवचनदवरमहहरथमवहजमसचएजमसलअथवमनयमयमलयदमरम अपवगकरहकनवपरउपससथरहकरम।

¶9

गवदमनअपरशमसककयअजधवकमदमरमअगभयमककवअगगमजममनरकमगवरकध कररवहहएयहरकरपसरमरगकयमरयमगकअगभयमकदमरमअनयसह-अगभयमककव समथगमलकरवमदलसवकमलवजममपववशहवरमलरभरछछलमखरपयवजलयवरएहह एवसपथमवररककपरलकमसमपनहकनवकवउपरमनरउसकमपरलकमफलघकगररनहह गकयमरयमहह।आववदकदमरमवमदलकमएडमलशनकमलवजपशमसनकव पदमजधकमररययदमरमअवहधरपसवकरमयमरयमहहजजसकमरणसववमदलकम परलकमफलरकमहहआहह।उनकमयहभलरकरहहगकअगभयमकदमरमकमररर अपरमधरसभलरपककगरकमहहरथमअगभयमककमअगगमजममनरपमथरनमपत गनरसरगकयवजमनवयकगयहह।

¶10

उभयपकयकवगवदमनअजधवकमरणककसमननवऔरवररममनआववदनममगकए रएकथनयपरगवचमरकरनवकवउपरमसर, यहनयमयमलयइसरमयपरहहगक आववदककवगवदमनअजधवकमदमरमअगगमजममनरदवनवकवजलएककईउपयमकएवस पयमरपआधमरपसरमरनहहगकयमरयमहह।

¶11

आववदकगनभरयजससहकमवररममनअगगमजममनरआववदनपत 6. रदनमसमर, गनरसरगकयमजमरमहह।

¶12

हमलमसगक, आववदकससबसजधरगवचमरणनयमयमलयकवसमकगनयगमरजममनर आववदनपतपसरमरकरनवहवरमसवरसतहह।

¶13

Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Rahul

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAHUL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nirbhay Singh v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nirbhay Singh v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases