Shakun Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. (Allahabad High Court, Crl. Misc. AB Application No. 10588 of 2024; Shakun Sharma v. State of U.P. and another; neutral citation 2025:AHC:112551) dismissed as infructuous on 14.07.2025 by Dr. Justice Gautam Chowdhary, after counsel Rewti Raman Patel stated the application had become infructuous and declined to press any argument on it. Illustrative of disposal-as-infructuous practice; no merits of the bail question decided, no precedents cited, no quantum involved. Caution: Hindi body text (paras 6-8) is OCR-corrupted.
What did the court decide?
After hearing counsel for the applicant (Rewti Raman Patel) and the learned Additional Government Advocate and perusing the record, the Court recorded counsel's statement that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous and that he did not wish to press any argument on it, and accordingly dismissed (निरस्त किया जाता है) the application as infructuous.