Disposed¶11

Sanjay Gaur v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Jan 2025ABAIL/102/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; anticipatory bail; Section 438 Cr.P.C.; withdrawal of application; surrender within four weeks; no coercive action; IPC Sections 406 and 420; Case Crime No. 981 of 2016; Case No. 692 of 2018; P.S. Robertsganj; District Sonbhadra; Satender Kumar Antil (2022) 10 SCC 51; Krishan Pahal, J.; order dated 15.1.2025.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of on withdrawal with liberty: applicant directed to surrender before the court concerned within four weeks; no coercive action against the applicant for four weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier; any regular bail application to be decided in view of Satender Kumar Antil, (2022) 10 SCC 51. ¶11

Sanjay Gaur vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:6585

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 102 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Sanjay Gaur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anamika Srivastava,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case No. 692 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 981 of 2016, under Sections 406 & 420 of I.P.C., P.S.- Robertsganj, District- Sonbhadra.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date:- 15.1.2025 Siddhant

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjay Gaur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Gaur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajan Mishra vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Sita vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Yadav Alias Shakeel Yadav vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Bhatnagar vs State of U.P.

Nirmala Devi vs State of U.P.

Sourav Nagar vs State of U.P.