Disposed¶7

Manu Gopal v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Apr 2025A483/98/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AHC APPLICATION U/S 483 No. 98 of 2025, Justice Nalin Kumar Srivastava, order dated 24.4.2025; complainant Manu Gopal v. State of U.P. and Another (advocates Akshay Upadhyay and Khwaja Shamshad Ahmad for applicant; G.A. for opposite party); direction to Special Judge N.I. Act-II, Allahabad to finish evidence of Complaint Case No. 1492 of 2023 (Section 138 N.I. Act, Civil Lines, Allahabad) within 3 months and expedite trial disposal; all stake holders bound to assist; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with a direction to the court concerned (Special Judge, N.I. Act-II, Allahabad) to conclude the evidence of Complaint Case No. 1492 of 2023 preferably within 3 months and thereafter expedite disposal; all stake holders bound by the order to assist the Court. ¶7

Manu Gopal vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62956

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 98 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Manu Gopal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akshay Upadhyay,Khwaja Shamshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No. 1492 of 2023, under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Sttaion- Civil Lines, District-Allahabad pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, N.I. Act-II, Allahabad expeditiously within stipulated period.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the complainant in the present case and the trial is pending at the stage of evidence and only dates are being fixed. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest to decide the said case. Applicant in this case has suffered monetary loss. The accused is not cooperating with the case.

¶9

I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record.

¶10

In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to conclude the evidence preferably within 3 months, thereafter make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment.

¶11

It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.

¶12

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Fhd

¶14

Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manu Gopal v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manu Gopal v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash Upadhyay vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dinesh Maurya vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinod Kumar Rai vs State of U.P. and 17 Others

Asha Devi vs Union of India and Another

Meharban Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Neeraj Alias Sunny vs State of U.P.