Disposed

Neeraj Alias Sunny v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Apr 2025NA529/228/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed an application under Section 529 BNSS seeking to expedite the disposal of a pending criminal case. The court directed the concerned court to dispose of the matter within one year, instructed parties to avoid unnecessary adjournments, and stipulated that all stakeholders must assist in expeditious disposal.

What did the court decide?

Directed the concerned court to dispose of Criminal Case No. 5512 of 2011 within one year and ensured no unnecessary adjournments.

Neeraj Alias Sunny vs State of U.P. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:62822

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 228 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Neeraj Alias Sunny Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jay Prakash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No.5512 of 2011, arising out of case crime no. 234 of 2011, under Section 408 IPC, Police Station-Dankaur, District- Gautam Buddh Nagar pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, First, Gautam Buddh Nagar expeditiously within stipulated period.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case and the matter is pending since 2011 at the stage of evidence. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case.

¶9

Learned AGA opposed the prayer.

¶10

I have considered the submissions and perused the record.

¶11

It appears from perusal of the record that the prosecution is lethargic in producing the witnesses before the Court. Since the matter is very old, the Court concerned is expected to make all endevours for expeditious disposal of the case preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted.

¶12

It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.

¶13

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Fhd

¶15

Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Neeraj Alias Sunny v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Alias Sunny v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash Upadhyay vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dinesh Maurya vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinod Kumar Rai vs State of U.P. and 17 Others

Asha Devi vs Union of India and Another

Meharban Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Jagdeesh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others