Disposed¶14

Anurudh Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Nov 2025A483/952/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 483 application; direction for expeditious trial; Section 143(3) NI Act six-month conclusion mandate; Section 138 NI Act cheque case; Criminal Case No.3472 of 2021 (Anirudh vs. Jag Prasad); Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court no.21 Sultanpur; pendency since 2021; expedite proceedings; application disposed of; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Brij Raj Singh, J.; November 12, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the trial court to adhere to Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and expedite the proceedings of Criminal Case No.3472 of 2021 in accordance with law; the application stands disposed of. ¶14

Anurudh Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 952 of 2025

¶3

Anurudh Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Pramod Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 16

¶9

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶11

The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no.21, Sultanpur, to decide the Criminal Case bearing Criminal Case/Suit No.3472 of 2021 (Anirudh vs. Jag Prasad) filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.

¶12

The aforesaid case of the applicant is pending since the year 2021. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress.

¶13

In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law.

¶14

This application stands disposed of .

¶15

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶16

November 12, 2025

¶17

Sachin

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anurudh Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anurudh Kumar @ Anirudh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ghanshyam Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko

Mohammad Hamid Ansari Vs the State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Neeraj Patel and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Kamini Awasthi and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vinai Kumar Singh and 9 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ram Mohan Gupta and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another