Applicant, complainant in a Section 420 IPC complaint case pending since 2011 at the final argument stage, sought expeditious disposal. The court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate to decide it within one month and to avoid unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13335
Court No. - 82
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 893 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt Pushpa Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Asif Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court could direct the trial court to decide a complaint case pending since 2011 within a stipulated period under Section 483 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt Pushpa Verma
State Of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
