Disposed¶14

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko . and 5 Others

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2025A483/748/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Speedy trial; expeditious disposal; direction to Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act Bahraich; criminal misc. case no. 117/XII/2024 under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.; Article 21; Application U/S 483; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 11; Saurabh Lavania, J.; decided September 9, 2025; relied on Maneka Gandhi, Hussainara Khatoon, Kadra Pahadiya; counsel Neelam Pandey; G.A. for State of U.P.; application disposed of with expedite direction, no monetary component.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Court concerned (Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Bahraich) to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue (criminal misc. case no. 117/XII/2024) expeditiously. ¶14

Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko . and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 748 of 2025

Pramod Kumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko . And 5 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Neelam Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 11

¶9

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶10

Heard Ms. Neelam Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶11

The instant application has been preferred for the following main relief:-

¶12

"to direct the learned additional sessions judge / special judge S.C. / S.T. Act Bahraich in not deciding the criminal misc. case no. 117 /XII/2024 Pramod Kumar Vs. Rakesh alias Nakchhed and others under section 156 (3) Cr. P.C. P.S. Ramgaon District Bahraich, expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice."

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81 and Kadra Pahadiya and Others Vs. State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671 , the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of.

¶15

September 9, 2025 Mohit Singh/-

¶16

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko . and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko . and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Zilajeet Prajapati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Lahuri Prasad Kashyap and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Smt. Prema Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Rishi Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Sita Soni vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Pramod Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko . and 5 Others