Disposed

Nabijullah and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Dec 2025A482/9937/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of a criminal jurisdiction application. The court permitted applicants to file a discharge application within three weeks and directed expeditious hearing. It also stayed coercive steps against them for six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to move discharge application through counsel within three weeks; stay on coercive steps for six weeks; order for expeditious disposal.

Nabijullah and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9937 of 2025

¶3

Nabijullah And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 14

¶9

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶11

This application has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 10.11.2020 as well as summoning order dated 14.12.2020 passed in S.T. No. 1284 of 2020, arising out of F.I.R. No. 109 of 2019, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Salon, District Raebareli.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that charge sheet was submitted by the Investigating Officer in mechanical manner and the cognizance was taken by the court below on 14.12.2020, but till today, the charge has not been framed. However, after arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

¶13

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶14

In view of above, it is provided that applicants may move their discharge application through counsel within three weeks from

¶15

A482 No. 9937 of 2025

¶16

¶17

today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

¶18

For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶19

With the above directions, this application is disposed of.

¶20

(Rajeev Singh,J.)

¶21

December 12, 2025 VKS

¶22

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nabijullah and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nabijullah and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Abubakar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Kunwar Gyanendra Singh Bais and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Arvind Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sarvesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Manju Dixit vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sarfaraz Ansari @ Munni vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another