Abubakar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Dec 2025A482/3405/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing criminal proceedings based on compromise. High Court directs trial court to verify compromise before quashing; grants interim protection from coercive action for one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to lower court to verify compromise if filed; no coercive action against applicants for one month. ¶¶16-¶18

Abubakar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3405 of 2025

¶3

Abubakar And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui, Rehan Mubassir

¶7

Court No. - 14

¶8

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

¶9

1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶10

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the private respondent, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

3. The instant application has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Misc. Case No.128077 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No.74 of 2024 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354A I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Bijnor, District - Lucknow.

¶12

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.SA1 to the supplementary affidavit.

¶13

5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶14

A482 No. 3405 of 2025

¶15

¶16

6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.

¶17

7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶18

8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶19

9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶20

(Rajeev Singh,J.)

¶21

December 11, 2025

¶22

GauraV/-

¶23

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Abubakar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abubakar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ajharuddin and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Smt. Umrawati @ Umrawati Kushwaha and Another Vs State of U.P. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Imran @ Guddan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Chandra Udai Pratap Narain vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Vidhan Bhavan Lko. and 2 Others

Kunwar Gyanendra Singh Bais and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Arvind Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others