Disposed

Amjad Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 8 Others

Allahabad HC7 Nov 2025A482/9192/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise. The Court did not quash the proceedings immediately, directing the trial court to verify the compromise in the presence of the parties. The Court imposed a one-month moratorium on coercive action.

What did the court decide?

One-month stay on coercive action against applicants; case remanded to trial court for verification of compromise.

Amjad Ali and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9192 of 2025

¶3

Amjad Ali And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 8 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Waqar Husain, Arzoo Azhad Naqvi, Neelofar Azhad Naqvi, Salman Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 14

¶8

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

¶9

Sri Prem Kumar Srivastava, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶12

"To quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 3572/2019 arising out of Case Crime No.1360 of 2017 u/s 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452, 307, 120-B I.P.C., P.S.Thakurganj, District- Lucknow and to quash the impugned summoning order dated 28.01.2019."

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.7 to the application.

¶14

Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶15

A482 No. 9192 of 2025

¶16

¶17

Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.

¶18

The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶19

For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶20

Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶21

(Rajeev Singh,J.)

¶22

November 7, 2025

¶23

Arpan

¶24

Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amjad Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amjad Ali and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Pandey and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Lko. and Another

Badrinarayan Dubey @ Bablu Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko.

Suresh Kumar @ Suresh Verma @ Munna Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru.the Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home Govt. of U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko

Jagdamba Prasad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Shiv Pankaj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another