Vikas Sahu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2025A482/8240/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC application for quashing of complaint case under Section 406 IPC; interim protection from coercive action for 30 days granted; reliance on Satender Kumar Antil and Musheer Alam judgments; liberty to approach court again at appropriate stage.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with liberty to approach court again at appropriate stage; interim protection from coercive action for 30 days ¶¶15-¶19

Vikas Sahu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8240 of 2025

Vikas Sahu

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 11

¶9

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶11

The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-

¶12

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Complaint case no. 645/2024 and summoning order dated 28.07.2025 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), FTC/ACJM, Faizabad contained as Annexure no. 1 and 2 and also to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no.645/2024, under section 406 I.P.C. name and style as Ramesh Sahu Vs. Vikas Sahu, relating to Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya."

¶13

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.

¶14

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s).

¶15

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

¶16

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the

¶17

A482 No. 8240 of 2025

¶18

¶19

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained.

¶20

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶21

September 24, 2025

¶22

Arun/-

¶23

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vikas Sahu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Sahu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Vijay Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Ghanshyam Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vikas Sahu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Shiv Kumar Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Pravesh Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others