Applicant sought quashing of charge sheet and summons in an excise and cheating case, arguing all witnesses were police personnel. The court held that the reliability of police witnesses is a matter for trial and inherent jurisdiction cannot be exercised where disputed facts exist; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34042
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7649 of 2024
Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajkumar Singh,Ravindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
exclusively in Haryana, were recovered from the spot, and the recovery itself forms a substantial basis for prosecuting the applicant.
Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the charge sheet and summoning order should be quashed where all prosecution witnesses are police personnel and there is no independent public witness.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Dharmendra Kumar
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
