Disposed

Vakeel Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Aug 2025A482/6845/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of chargesheet and cognizance order. The court granted liberty to file a bail application in the trial court, which will be decided expeditiously per a Supreme Court judgment.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail application; applicant to file bail application before trial court within two weeks for expeditious decision.

Vakeel Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6845 of 2025

Vakeel Khan

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 14

¶9

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶11

Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned Charge Sheet and Cognizance Order dated 02-11-2023 passed by Learned A.C.J.M., III, Raebareli in Criminal Case No. 23193/2023, State Vs. Vakeel Khan, Crime No. 255/2023, Under Section 354 (A), 504,506 Ι.Ρ.C., Police Station Deeh District- Raebareli.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶13

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .

¶14

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶15

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties,

¶16

A482 No. 6845 of 2025

¶17

¶18

it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶19

Further, the applicant will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the legal and factual pleas which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law.

¶20

The application is disposed off accordingly.

¶21

August 25, 2025 Mayank

¶22

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶23

Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vakeel Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vakeel Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shavez Mirza Vs State of U.P. Deptt. Home Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. and 3 Others

Abhishek Agarwal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Ramdarash Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Anoop Kumar Kalra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ram Narayan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Shri Ram and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others