Retired employee faced prosecution under Section 452 of the Companies Act for not vacating the company quarter. After he vacated, the court quashed the proceedings with consent of parties and directed release of retiral dues within a month after deducting electric and maintenance charges only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13295
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 53 of 2024
Applicant :- Sujit Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of Up Others Counsel for Applicant :- Hari Nath Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anil Kumar Ray,G.A.
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
the applicant has vacated the quarter of the company on 10.12.2024.
16.02.2024.
Order Date :- 24.1.2025 KS
Digitally signed by :- KISHAN SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 against a retired employee who failed to vacate the company quarter should be quashed.
Whether damage charges could be deducted from an ex-employee's retiral benefits for non-vacation of the company quarter.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sujit Kumar Pandey
State Of Up
Hindalco Industries Ltd.
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
