This highly belated application has been filed challenging the summoning order dated 01.04.2019 and the order dated 05.07.2019 by means of which the bailable warrant was issued without explaining the delay and latches. The only explanation given by the applicant is that he came to know about the criminal proceedings only in the month of April, 2025, when the bailable warrant was received from Police, but it is not the case of applicant that he is not residing at the given address. Even otherwise, the submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was merely a driver of the loader, from which the food item was being transported at the time when the sample was taken, whereas in the proforma for information to the trader he has signed at the place of the trader and in the complaint filed by the Food Safety Officer, Hardoi also the applicant has been shown as trader. No contrary evidence could be produced before this Court. Thus, the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is misconceived.
