Mira Gaud v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under S.482 Cr.P.C. by wife of accused facing S.T. No. 692/2021 (Sections 376, 313, 506 IPC; 3/4 & 5/6 PACSO Act; Case Crime No. 824/2019, P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow) and proclamation/attachment proceedings under Ss.82/83 Cr.P.C.; challenge to Special Court PACSO Act order dated 27.09.2024; prayer for mandamus regarding rehabilitation in ancestral property; withdrawn at admission stage with AGA consent; dismissed as withdrawn on 20.01.2025; bench: Saurabh Lavania, J.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; 2025:AHC-LKO:3305. Keywords: quashing, withdrawal, Ss.82/83 Cr.P.C., PACSO Act, mandamus.
What did the court decide?
On being confronted that proceedings under Sections 82/83 Cr.P.C. had been initiated against the accused, learned counsel for the applicant (wife of the accused) stated that he did not want to press the application and sought its dismissal as withdrawn; learned AGA had no objection.