Single-paragraph default dismissal of an application u/s 482 dated 26th August 2025 for absence of applicants' counsel without adjournment request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4611 of 2016
Mohd. Imran And Ors. .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) : Counsel for Applicant(s) Chandra Bhanu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Neither learned counsel for the applicants is present to press this application nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed in default.
August 26, 2025
Nitesh
(Manish Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Imran And Ors.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
