Dismissed¶13

Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC16 Sept 2025A482/44545/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 Cr.P.C. application dismissed as infructuous; Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Application U/S 482 No. 44545 of 2024; decided September 17, 2025 by Nand Prabha Shukla, J.; counsel: Janardan Prasad Tripathi for applicant, G.A. for opposite parties; no merits adjudication, no precedents discussed, no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous. ¶13

Ranjeet Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44545 of 2024

Ranjeet Singh

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Janardan Prasad Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 78

¶10

HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶12

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this application has become infructuous, therefore the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶13

Accordingly, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

¶14

September 17, 2025 Puspendra

¶15

(Nand Prabha Shukla,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases