Shivam Vishnoi and 2 Others v. State of Up and Another
Allahabad HCA482/4409/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC by Shivam Vishnoi and others against the State of U.P. Opposite party no.2 did not appear despite service; matter listed for hearing after three weeks with interim order extended.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, extended until further orders.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4409 of 2024
¶3
Shivam Vishnoi And 2 Others
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammed Shadan, Vikrant Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
¶6
Court No. - 83
¶7
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
¶8
- Shri Vikrant Gupta appears for the applicants.
¶9
- None appears for the opposite party No.2 despite service of notice, as is evident from the office report dated 16.5.2024.
¶10
- As no one has put in appearance for the opposite party No.2 nor has any counter affidavit been filed by the opposite party No.2, list for hearing after three weeks.
¶11
- Interim order, if any, is extended until further orders of the Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shivam Vishnoi
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/4409/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court