Sanjit Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a Section 482 CrPC quashing application; counter affidavit time granted, interim order extended.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2983 of 2024
Sanjit Kumar And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Chandra, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Siddharth Shanker Mishra
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
- Case called out. Sri Siddharth Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file a counter affidavit. Two weeks' time is granted to the applicants to file a rejoinder affidavit, if any.
- List thereafter.
- Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date of listing.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjit Kumar And Another
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/2983/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court