Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of a charge-sheet and summoning order in an assault case under Sections 147, 148, 325, 427 IPC. The court held that appreciation of evidence is a matter of trial; the FIR and injured's statement disclose offences, and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:144947
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3956 of 2025
Applicant :- Rohit Mangal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sikandar B. Kochar,G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 VMA
Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the charge-sheet and cognizance/summoning order in a rioting and grievous hurt case should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rohit Mangal
State of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
