Nitin Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116138

Court No. - 77

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38476 of 2024

Applicant :- Nitin Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶7

The instant application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned chargesheet dated 09.09.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 16.10.2024 including the entire proceedings of Gangster Session Trial no. 3051 of 2024 (State vs. Nitin Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 01 of 2024, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Mahuwakheda, District Aligarh pending in the court of learned Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Gangster Act0, Court no. 4, Aligarh as well as to stay the further proceedings of abovementioned case.

¶8

Learned counsel for applicant took precise grounds for challenging the entire proceedings that there is hardly any compliance of Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 which clearly demonstrate that the gang chart will not be approved summarily but after due discussion in a joint meeting of the Commissioner of Police/District Magistrate/Senior Superintendent of Police/Superintendent of Police which has already been prepared by concerned In-charge of Police Station/Station House Officer/Inspector who present it before Additional Superintendent of Police and after seeking his due recommendation the same has to present before the District Head of Police and thereafter the same was to be approved in joint meeting with the authorities who are mentioned under Rule 5 who recommended the same and thereafter at the time of approval, the same has to be jointly finally approved. The approval which is appended along with application as Annexure no. 6 available at page nos. 61 to 63 wherein the different dates have been mentioned by the different authorities

¶9

which is strictly in terms of provision available under Rule 5 but there is hardly any compliance in respect of Rule 5(3)(a) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant specifically submitted that there must be a joint meeting as mentioned in the Rule 5(3)(a) and the same has never been disclosed or mentioned at the time of approving the gang chart by concerned District Magistrate.

¶11

On earlier occasion, instructions has been called for ascertaining the fact whether any joint meeting has been held amongst the responding authorities or not, and in response, it has been instructed by the competent authority to learned AGA that no meeting has been held and the same is contrary in respect of Rule 5(3)(a) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021.

¶12

After hearing rival submissions extended by learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that the rules are crystal clear at the initial stage which is mentioned under Rule 5(3)(a) of the Rules of 2021 for holding joint meeting of the authorities concerned which includes the presenting officer, forwarding officer and thereafter the discussion shall be made with the approving authority. The rules mentioned below to Rule 5 of the Rules of 2021 although clarified the wording and the orders which ought to be passed by the approving authority but the missing of joint meeting/discussion is not necessarily to be reproduced time and again since the legislature and law makers are conscious not to repeat the procedure in each and every rules/sections in the concerned Act/Rules since the study of the sections available in the rules framed under the Act has to be read in a procedural manner where it is written in sub-sequential order and as such the provision contained under the Rule 5(3)(a) of Rules of 2021 has to be given preference while reading other rules which are mentioned below to Rule 5 of the Rules of 2021 and as such the specific provision for holding joint meeting is mandatory on the part of all the officers who are involved in forwarding the gang chart and finally it is incumbent upon the approving authority to hold meeting under Section 5(3)(a) of the Rules of 2021. The said procedure which is mandated on the part of the approving authority is missing in the instant matter and as such entire proceedings arising out of approval of the gang chart which culminated into preferring the charge sheet dated 09.09.2024 thereafter the order passed by learned concerned court by way of passing cognizance/summoning order dated 16.10.2024 is hereby quashed and set aside.

¶13

However, the above mentioned order will not preclude the concerned authorities for re-initiation of the proceedings against applicants, if required in future, in accordance with law.

¶14

The application stands allowed accordingly.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.7.2025 #Vik/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nitin Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases