A Section 482 CrPC application seeking quashing of a Section 138 NI Act complaint was not pressed for adjudication; the High Court instead disposed of it by directing the trial court at Bareilly to decide the complaint expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40870
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37345 of 2024
Applicant :- Shri Ajay Agarwal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Anand Agarwal,Shreya Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
court below who is seized of the matter pertaining to Complaint Case No. 212 of 2023(Shri Ajay Agarwal Vs. Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal) to decide the said proceedings with most expedition without granting any unnecessary adjournments, subject to legal impediment, if any.
Order Date :- 20.3.2025 A. Prajapati
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court below should be directed to expedite the pending Section 138 NI Act complaint proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shri Ajay Agarwal
State of U.P.
Shri Ajay Kumar Agarwal
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
