The court lists the case for future hearing due to the non-appearance of the applicants. No substantive decision or legal proposition is recorded in this order.
The court lists the case for future hearing due to the non-appearance of the applicants. No substantive decision or legal proposition is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3343 of 2025
Rajeev Kumar Proprietor Dadda Ji Gold Company And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd Jameel, Shahabuddin Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
(Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
October 30, 2025
VMA
Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajeev Kumar Proprietor Dadda Ji Gold Company
Another
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
