Allowed

Rajkumar Dubey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.

Allahabad HC28 Apr 2025A482/3203/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This application under Section 482 CrPC and Section 528 BNSS was allowed. The court directed that the personal bond and two sureties provided by the applicant in Case Crime No. 121 of 2022 shall be held good for release on bail in all other cases registered against him.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; personal bond and two sureties from case 121/2022 accepted for release on bail in other registered cases.

Rajkumar Dubey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24165

¶2

Court No. - 14

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3203 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Rajkumar Dubey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Pratyush Rawat,Devansh Kumar,Soumya Dixit

¶6

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶7

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶9

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS") has been filed by the applicant with the following main relief:

¶10

"Wherefore, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned trial Court of District Sultanpur to accept the personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned in one case, and the same shall be considered by the Court concerned as sureties and bonds in other cases for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail in the interest of justice."

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in two cases. He has next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned, the details of are as under :

¶12

(i) Case Crime No. 121 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur in which the bail was granted on 26.3.2025 by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Court No. 4, Sultanpur with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount.

¶13

(ii) Case Crime No. 122 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur in which the bail was granted on 26.3.2025 by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Court No. 4, Sultanpur with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount.

¶14

He has further submitted that the applicant is a very

¶15

poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.

¶17

Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.

¶18

Considering the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and also the observations made by this Court in the case of Shivam Gupta @ Shubham @ Lavi vs. State of U.P. through Secretary Home Civil Sectt. Lko (Application U/S 482 No.466 of 2024) as well as in Dr. Abhishek Yadav vs. State of U.P. (Application U/S 482 No.18948 of 2023) , the present application is allowed with a direction that in case the applicant provides the personal bond and two sureties mentioned in the following one of the two bail orders dated 26.3.2025 i.e. (i) Case Crime No. 121 of 2022 under Section 380 IPC, P.S. Kamrauli, District Sultanpur (two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and a personal bond of the same amount) then the same shall be held good in rest of the cases registered against the applicant, as mentioned above, and the applicant shall be released on bail on that sureties.

¶19

Order Date :- 28.4.2025 AKK

¶20

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rajkumar Dubey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar Dubey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Budhram @ Buddhu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Mohituddin and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Kesh Ram Verma @ Keshav Ram Verma and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Dev Vrat Gautam vs Bhagauti Singh, presently posted as Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Regional Office Varanasi

Jagdish Prasad Shukla vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Sanju Sharma @ Dheeraj Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another