Rahul Sahu @ Rahul Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application; charge-sheet dated 24.12.2019; cognizance order dated 21.01.2022; Case No. 129 of 2022 (State Vs. Vijay Kumar Jaiswal and others); Case Crime No. 2043 of 2014; Sections 147, 148, 307, 353, 332, 333, 336, 504, 506 IPC; Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act; P.S. Kotwali Katra, District Mirzapur; CJM Mirzapur; interim protection from coercive action for 15 days; expeditious disposal of application to set aside impugned order; applicant Rahul Sahu @ Rahul Gupta; counsel Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Sarvendra Dwivedi; G.A. for State.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. disposed of without deciding the merits of quashing; applicant permitted to appear and move the trial Court for setting aside the impugned order (to be decided expeditiously), with protection from coercive action for 15 days or till such application is moved, whichever is earlier.