Chattar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 CrPC quashing on compromise; inherent jurisdiction; charge sheet dated 17-07-2022 and cognizance/summoning order dated 14-11-2022 quashed; Section 420 IPC cheating; Case Crime No. 010 of 2022; P.S. Goverdhan; District Mathura; Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ACJM Court No. 2 Mathura; Trial Case No. 48833 of 2023 (State v. Chattar); verification of compromise by trial court (orders dated 12.08.2024 and 27.02.2025); B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675; Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat; State of M.P. v. Deepak; State of M.P. v. Manish; J. Ramesh Kamath v. Mohana Kurup; State of M.P. v. Rajveer Singh; Parbatbhai Ahir v. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641; applicant Chattar; Allahabad High Court; Praveen Kumar Giri, J.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. allowed; the entire criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 010 of 2022 (u/s 420 IPC, P.S. Goverdhan, District-Mathura) â including the charge sheet dated 17-07-2022 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 14-11-2022 â together with Trial Case No. 48833 of 2023 (State v. Chattar) were quashed on the basis of the compromise between the parties, and the trial Court was directed not to proceed against the accused-applicant.