Ajay v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Ajay; APPLICATION U/S 482 No. 21369 of 2024; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application; charge-sheet dated 18.07.2020; Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C.; Case Crime No. 184 of 2019; Police Station Surir, District Mathura; Case No. 792 of 2021 (State versus Ajay Kumar); Additional Judicial Magistrate10/Civil Judge (Junior Division) Mathura; counsel did not press relief on merit; relief refused; surrender within three weeks; bail application to be decided expeditiously; Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922; no coercive action interim protection; disposed of; Hon'ble Deepak Verma, J.; Order Date 18.7.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:116818; Munendra Nath Chaubey (counsel for applicant); G.A. (counsel for opposite party).
What did the court decide?
Quashing relief refused; in lieu thereof the applicant is directed to surrender within three weeks, his bail application (if made) to be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922, with an undertaking of no coercive action during the interim period (three weeks or till surrender, whichever earlier); application disposed of accordingly.