Disposed

Manoj Katara and 2 Others v. State of Up ANOther

Allahabad HC6 Feb 2025A482/2013/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for quashing proceedings in light of a compromise. The Court directed the parties to file the compromise before the trial court within two weeks for verification. If verified, a report would be prepared and filed with this Court. The matter was listed for further consideration.

What did the court decide?

Conditionally allowed; parties directed to verify compromise with trial court and file report.

Manoj Katara and 2 Others vs State of Up ANOther — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2013 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Manoj Katara And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up Another Counsel for Applicant :- Balbeer Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manish Jaiswal

¶4

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 07.10.2022, of Complaint Case No. 2532 of 2019 (Dharmendra Tiwari Vs. Manoj Katara & Others), under Sections 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Tajganj, District Agra, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Court No. 2, Agra, in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that during the pendency of this case both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the said compromise will be filed before the trial court concerned within two weeks from today. It is further stated that proceedings of the aforesaid case may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶8

Whether a compromise has taken place or not can best be ascertained by the court where the proceedings are pending, after ensuring the presence of the parties before it.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that in case the parties appear before the trial court and file an appropriate application for

¶10

compromise within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be verified by the court concerned in accordance with law and if the said compromise is verified, the same shall be made part of the record and report to that effect will be prepared and the parties would be allowed to obtain certified copy thereof and file the same before this Court by the next date.

¶11

List on 10.03.2025 within top twenty cases.

¶12

Interim order, if any, shall continue till the next date of listing.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.2.2025 SK Srivastava

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj Katara and 2 Others v. State of Up ANOther

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Katara and 2 Others v. State of Up ANOther

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sudha Pandey and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Meharban vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Asgar vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Prateek Bansal and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Akash and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Drag Pal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others