Disposed¶11

Janardan Mali and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Mar 2025A482/1963/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Raj Beer Singh, J., 20.3.2025 (2025:AHC:41082); APPLICATION U/S 482 No. 1963 of 2025; Janardan Mali & 2 Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.; quashing of proceedings/summoning order 09.05.2024, Complaint Case No.1173 of 2021, Ss 323, 452, 504, 506, 379 IPC, P.S. Bansdih, Ballia (ACJM-I); quashing not pressed; direction for expedited bail per Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC Online SC 922; 3-week no-coercive-action protection; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Applicants to appear/surrender before the court concerned within three weeks and apply for bail, whereupon their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law; no coercive action against the applicants for three weeks or till surrender before the court below, whichever is earlier. ¶11

Janardan Mali and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the entire proceedings, including the summoning order dated 09.05.2024, in Complaint Case No.1173 of 2021 (Suresh Mali v. Janardan Mali & others) should be quashed. +1 more

¶7

Ratio / Principle

It is directed that if the applicants appear/surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of the order and apply for bail, their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with settled law.

¶9

Key takeaways

For a period of three weeks from the date of the order, or till the applicants surrender before the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.ratio¶10
With the aforesaid observations, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was disposed of (the quashing prayer having been expressly stated as not pressed).ratio¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Raj Beer Singh, J.), Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:41082, order dated 20.3.2025 — Application U/S 482 No. 1963 of 2025, Janardan Mali & 2 Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr., sought quashing of entire proceedings including summoning order dated 09.05.2024 in Complaint Case No.1173 of 2021 (Suresh Mali v. Janardan Mali & others) under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506, 379 IPC, P.S. Bansdih, District Ballia, pending before ACJM-I, Ballia. Counsel for applicants stated the quashing prayer was not pressed and applicants were willing to appear before the trial court, requesting expedited bail decision in accordance with the law laid down in Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC Online SC 922. Court directed: on appearance/surrender within three weeks and application for bail, bail applications to be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law; no coercive action for three weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier. Application disposed of.

Janardan Mali and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardan Mali and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Devendra vs State of U.P.

Sageer vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shanti Babu Sharma vs State of U.P.

Shanno vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Archna Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Neetu Sharma vs State of Up and Another