Disposed¶8

Govind Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Apr 2025A482/1863/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application u/s 482 No. 1863 of 2025; Govind Prasad v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Saurabh Lavania J.; order dated 12.3.2025; mediation suggested by counsel; notice to opposite party no. 2; steps within a week; listed 17.04.2025 as fresh; no interim protection from mere pendency; Court concerned free to proceed per law; Satender Kumar Antil (2022) 10 SCC 51; Musheer Alam 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116.

What did the court decide?

Notice directed to be issued to opposite party no. 2 (steps within a week); case listed/put up for 17.04.2025 as fresh; express clarification that pendency confers no interim protection; liberty to seek benefit of the law in Satender Kumar Antil and Musheer Alam. ¶8

Govind Prasad vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether the issue involved in the instant case can be resolved by way of mediation, as stated by counsel and noted by the Court. +3 more

¶6

Ratio / Principle

Notice to be issued to opposite party no. 2, with steps to be taken within a week.

¶7

Key takeaways

The case is to be listed/put up on 17.04.2025 as fresh.ratio¶8
Mere pendency of the present application before this Court shall not be treated as interim protection to the applicants, and it is open for the Court concerned to proceed in the matter in accordance with the law.ratio¶9
It is open for the applicants to seek the benefit of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another.obiter

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Court No. 12), Saurabh Lavania, J. — Application u/s 482 No. 1863 of 2025, Govind Prasad v. State of U.P. thr. its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and another; order dated 12.3.2025. Counsel for the applicant stated that the issue involved could be solved by way of mediation. Taking note, the Court directed that notice issue to opposite party no. 2 with steps to be taken within a week, and listed the matter for 17.04.2025 as fresh. The Court made clear that mere pendency of the present application shall not be treated as interim protection to the applicants and that the Court concerned may proceed in accordance with law; in the meantime, the applicants remain open to seek the benefit of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51, and Musheer Alam vs. State of U.P., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116.

Govind Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Lailltun and 5 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Gaya Prasad and Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Tej Narayan Singh and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Sarvesh Dixit and Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Smt. Sita Devi @ Sirtaji and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Pankaj Pandey @ Manoj Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Anr.