Disposed

Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Mar 2025A482/1834/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings in a criminal case. The Court disposed of the application with liberty to the applicant to file for bail and discharge, directing expeditious consideration of such applications and restraining coercive police action for 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file bail and discharge applications; coercive action stayed for 30 days.

Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14791

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1834 of 2025 Applicant :- Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Another

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Surya Bhan Singh,Daya Shankar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶7

The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main reliefs:-

¶8

"To quash the proceedings of Criminal case no. 21/24 State of U. P. versus Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan as well as impugned order dated 1402-2024 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board Court no. 12, Raebareli, whereby he took the cognizance of the offence and also passed the order dated 08-11-2024 whereby summoning the petitioner without application of mind in criminal case no.21/24 arising out of Case Crime No. 315 of 2022, U/S 504, 506 I.P.C, Police Station Sareni, District - Raebareli."

¶9

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 , and also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may also be directed to be decided expeditiously.

¶10

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned, prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶12

Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below, if charges have not already been framed, and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶13

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.3.2025/Mohit Singh/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Yadav @ Shatrohan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Ramlotan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ajay Kumar Verma and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. and Another

Om Pal Singh and Ors. Vs State of U.P.

Sachin Verma and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Another

Arjun Singh and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another