Disposed¶11

Ramraheesh and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2025A482/1492/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC; quashing of summoning order; Chief Judicial Magistrate Kasganj; Complaint Case No. 931 of 2024; Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506 IPC; police station Soron; prayer not pressed; discharge application before trial court within three weeks; no coercive action; interim protection till disposal of discharge application; applicants to cooperate.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of on the applicants not pressing the quashing prayer; liberty granted to move a discharge application before the Trial Court within three weeks, with interim direction that no coercive action be taken for three weeks (and till disposal of the discharge application if filed within that period), subject to the applicants cooperating in its early disposal. ¶11

Ramraheesh and 9 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the summoning order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj in Complaint Case No. 931 of 2024 (Smt. Sadhna v. Ramraheesh and others) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC. (The prayer was ultimately not pressed by counsel.)

¶7

Court's answer

If the applicants move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court within three weeks from the date of this order, the trial court shall consider and decide it expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

For a period of three weeks from the date of the order, and if the discharge application is filed within that period, till its disposal, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, provided the applicants cooperate in the early disposal of the discharge application.

¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Raj Beer Singh, J.), disposing of an application under S. 482 CrPC (No. 1492 of 2025) which sought quashing of the summoning order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj in Complaint Case No. 931 of 2024 (Smt. Sadhna v. Ramraheesh and others) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Soron, District Kasganj. After arguing at some length, counsel for the applicants did not press the quashing prayer and sought leave to file a discharge application before the Trial Court. The High Court directed that if a discharge application is moved through counsel within three weeks, the trial court shall consider and decide it expeditiously in accordance with law; and that for three weeks, and till disposal of such discharge application if filed within that period, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, provided they cooperate in its early disposal.

Ramraheesh and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramraheesh and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anand Singh vs State of U.P.

Ashraf Alias Asraf vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dharmendra Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Raj Narayan vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul vs State of U.P. and Another

Avneesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others