Disposed¶10

Bablu and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Feb 2025A482/1328/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

482 CrPC quashing application not pressed; interim protection; surrender within three weeks; expeditious bail disposal; no coercive action; Complaint Case 3703 of 2020 Vishram Singh Vs. Arvind and Others; Sections 307 447 504 506 IPC; summoning order dated 13.03.2024; P.S. Jasrathpur District Etah; Additional Civil Judge (JD)/Judicial Magistrate Court No. 22 Etah; Allahabad High Court Court No. 73; Raj Beer Singh J.; Order Date 11.2.2025; 2025:AHC:20026.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. finally disposed of; applicants to appear/surrender within three weeks and apply for bail, with bail applications to be considered and decided expeditiously, and no coercive action against them for three weeks or till appearance/surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶10

Bablu and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the entire proceedings, including the summoning order dated 13.03.2024, of Complaint Case No. 3703 of 2020 (Vishram Singh Vs. Arvind and Others) under Sections 307, 447, 504, 506 IPC, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) / Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 22, Etah, should be quashed. +1 more

¶7

Ratio / Principle

If the applicants appear/surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks and apply for bail, their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶9

Key takeaways

For a period of three weeks from the date of the order, or till the applicants appear/surrender before the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.ratio¶9

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Raj Beer Singh, J.), Order Date 11.2.2025; Application U/S 482 No. 1328 of 2025; Bablu and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another (Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:20026). Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 13.03.2024, of Complaint Case No. 3703 of 2020 (Vishram Singh Vs. Arvind and Others) under Sections 307, 447, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Jasrathpur, District Etah, pending before Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 22, Etah. After arguing at some length, counsel for the applicants submitted the prayer was not being pressed and the applicants were willing to appear before the court concerned. The court directed that if the applicants appear/surrender within three weeks and apply for bail, their bail applications be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law, and that for three weeks or till appearance/surrender, whichever is earlier, no coercive action be taken against them. Application finally disposed of.

Bablu and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Gupta and 4 Others vs State of Up and Another

Pawan Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Prakash Yadav and 4 Others vs State of Up and Another

Saleem Alias Ghollu vs State of U.P.

Suraj Singh vs State of U.P.

Smt. Divya Rai vs State of U.P. and Another