Disposed

Monu Rathore and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC12 Feb 2025A482/1313/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of a 498A/323/504/506 IPC and dowry case on the basis of an amicable out-of-court compromise. The court directed the trial court to verify the compromise in presence of the parties and kept proceedings in abeyance for two months, permitting parties to seek quashing later based on the verified compromise.

What the court decided

AI extract

Monu Rathore and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl… — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9099

¶2

Court No. - 16

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1313 of 2025 Applicant :- Monu Rathore And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Jagdish Prasad Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Chandra Prakash Verma, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 who has filed vakalatnama which is taken on record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the petition. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the said compromise may be directed to be verified by the competent authority so that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of said compromise and its verification report.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has no objection to this innocuous prayer.

¶9

In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 27.02.2025 along with the copy of original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within two week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties.

¶10

For a period of two months, the proceedings of criminal case No. 907/2020 "Smt. Geeta Devi @ Parvati Rathore Vs. Monu Rathore and others", under Sections 498A/323/504/506 IPC and

¶11

Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.s. Mahila Thana, District Lucknow shall be kept in abeyance.

¶12

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.

¶13

Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification.

¶14

Office is directed to return the original compromise as well as certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules of the Court.

¶15

Order Date :- 12.2.2025 R.C.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Monu Rathore and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Monu Rathore and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Satyam Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Darbari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Sunil Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Fazil Hussain Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Geeta Shukla and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ritesh Kumar @ Kallu @ Ritesh Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another