Application to quash proceedings in a FIR case under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC, alleging offences disclosed by the FIR; prayer rejected and interim orders set at naught, with lower court directed to consider bail per Supreme Court Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1285 of 2021
Sarla Verma
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Anuj Dayal |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
A482 No. 1285 of 2021
2
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
December 11, 2025
S.Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC against the applicant should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
What directions should be issued regarding the applicant's pending bail application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sarla Verma
State of U.P.
Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
