Upendra Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
A Section 482 application was listed for revision; none appeared for the applicant while the State was represented, and the court directed the matter to be listed after three weeks.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1214 of 2025
Upendra Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deeplata
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
- List revised.
- None appears on behalf of applicant. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
- List the matter after three weeks.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
September 4, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Upendra Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/1214/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
- Order 2 · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court