Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed as infructuous; no one appeared to press the petition, no interim order was operating, and the case had lost relevance due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1083 of 2019
Uttam Shukla
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
||
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Nitin Tewari, Kumar Sachan |
Ayush, Shailesh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | Govt. Advocate | |
| Court No.- 23 |
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition.
From perusal of the record, it transpires that in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating in this case. It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
November 13, 2025
Shukla
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Uttam Shukla
State of U.P.
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
