Disposed

Amar Gupta v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC12 Nov 2025A482/5132/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application to quash criminal proceedings arising from a road accident case; applicant did not press it. Court disposed of the application permitting him to appear before the trial court within two weeks and seek bail, to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to appear before trial court within two weeks and file bail application, to be decided expeditiously as per Satender Kumar Antil.

Amar Gupta Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5132 of 2015

Amar Gupta

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sumit K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Manoj Kumari Tiwari

¶9

Court No. - 23

¶10

HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶12

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.1521 of 2014, arising out of Case Crime No.246 of 2013, under Sections 279, 338, 304-A, 427 I.P.C., Police Station Achalganj, District Unnao.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶14

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.

¶15

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶16

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial

¶17

A482 No. 5132 of 2015

¶18

¶19

court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶20

The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(Rajeev Bharti,J.)

¶22

November 12, 2025

¶23

Shukla

¶24

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amar Gupta v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Gupta v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kallayya Pattadamath @ Akshay Pattadamath vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Raju vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Hitesh Kumar @ Prem Gautam vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs Lko

Aadityanand Tiwari and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Narendra Kumar Mishra and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Santosh Mandal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Lko.